Seeing Guyasamin’s art was amazing.
I loved that there were videos along the way that we could get an idea of how
he worked on his paintings. It was amazing to see the work he produced. I
couldn’t believe that the one painting of the man only took him an hour. His
work was stunning. Normally, I don’t get into art museums, but I loved the messages
that he was portraying and the colors that he used. Aesthetically, his art was
very dramatic. To me, it seemed quite modern. I loved the colors and dramatic
faces. I loved that these paintings had a purpose. They covered very important
issues like starvation, government, and war. He wanted there to be world peace.
I think that his message came across clearly in his art. Some of his art
reminded me of Picasso because the body parts were distorted. Some of the
pieces you could move around and play around with how the painting would look
in different scenarios. Politically, he painted the picture that our world has
a lot of corruption. He showed the world in a darker light in order to bring
people together. I loved this. He created pictures of historical events. One
which portrayed children who suffered in gas chambers. Others showed fear or
death overtaking people. He was proving a point. There are problems all over
the world and in order to overcome them, we must all be willing to grab each other’s
hands and help. The first step is to realize there is corruption in the world.
He is so important because he was
exposing the issues in the world and strived for world peace. He looked at the
world in a different light and really wanted people to recognize that there are
issues. He looked deep into the characteristics of a person and wanted to
portray their feelings from the inside—no matter how morbid it was. It was
important for him to expose the negative. He was someone who stepped forward to
call out countries and people all over the world for the bad things that have
happened. He also had a meaning behind all of his pieces—making it relevant. He
had a message to share and wasn’t afraid to share it.
It seems like his painting of the
Chilean dictator was controversial because he is portrayed as a monster. He looks
like he has sharp teeth. There appears to be blood on his face and the entire
artwork is surrounded by black—which in this case could be an evil spirit or
even suggesting he is a devil. In the corner of the painting, he wrote, “Pillo-Shit,”
instead of Pinochet. He basically calls him a piece of shit. For people who
supported Pinochet, this would come across extremely rude and derogatory. Many
people would be offended because Pinochet was their leader.
Comments
Post a Comment