LaRoue - Blog #13
I would easily characterize Guyasamin’s art as bold with
regards to its aesthetic and political levels.
When considering the physical qualities of many of his paintings and
artwork there are often many eye-catching features. The paintings especially have been created
with very vivid colors and strong features.
They aren’t the most detailed creations compared to some creations made
with pencils and small tipped utensils, but they are equally as artistic. My favorite paintings only consisted of two
colors over a white background. One of
the paintings that we saw of his was an absolute masterpiece and it only took
him one hour to create. His paintings
are not only very pleasing to the eyes, but they are pleasing to the mind. He creates art with deep meaning behind
it. Many of the meanings behind his
creations are not the most pleasant, but they are pleasing in the sense of how
powerful and true they are. He creates
depicting a lot of pain and suffering.
Ecuador and the rest of South America does not have the greatest of
histories. Many of his paintings portray
slavery and suffering. There is often a
lot of anger in these paintings. As
well, we saw ones with mothers and children.
He creates art to make a statement for those that have the smallest
voices. As well, some of his more famous
paintings include ones of Quito. They
are powerful images that he creates with themes of different colors. They are open to interpretation. To restate what I initially said, it was
Guyasamin’s artistic ability to create such masterpieces with the powerful
meanings within them that pushes me to call his creates as bold.
Just as I just stated, I believe Guyasamin created a voice
for the people that don’t really have one.
He gave people a face and a voice in a way that was effective. People understood what he was trying to
create. In addition, Guyasamin created
some absolute masterpieces. With his
meaning and influences with his creations as well as his style, he could become
the important figure in Ecuadorian culture that is he today.
Guyasamin’s painting of Chilean dictator, Augosto Pinochet
is once again very bold. This painting
in particular creates some controversial thoughts in my head because he states
it like he thinks it should be. Most of
his paintings make bold statements but are easier for an open
interpretation. This painting shows
death. There is no way around it. I believe it was ultimately removed because
of this. There are always two sides to
the story. This painting only depicted
the one. I think that it is fair to
consider the other side. Maybe this
dictator was a horrible person, but not everyone believes that. As well, Guyasamin is from Ecuador,
specifically Quito. This painting is of someone that did not directly pertain
to him. Perhaps the controversy was
based off whether it was any of Guyasamin’s business with this opinion.
Comments
Post a Comment